<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Card-Room &#187; implied odds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.card-room.com/tag/implied-odds/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.card-room.com</link>
	<description>Card-Room</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Using Implied Odds Correctly</title>
		<link>http://www.card-room.com/blog/using-implied-odds-correctly</link>
		<comments>http://www.card-room.com/blog/using-implied-odds-correctly#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>malcolm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flush draw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online poker strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker draws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker strategym]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.card-room.com/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I first began to play Hold&#8217;em poker I used implied pot odds as a way of justifying calls that were not correct because I thought my opponent might be bluffing. Putting your opponent on a hand and deciding if how many of their chips you can win if you improve is difficult to do, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first began to <a href="https://www.bwin.com/epage.aspx?aid=27738" title="Play Texas Hold‘em poker online at bwin.com!">play Hold&#8217;em poker</a> I used implied <strong>pot odds </strong>as a way of justifying calls that were not correct because I thought my opponent might be bluffing. Putting your opponent on a hand and deciding if how many of their chips you can win if you improve is difficult to do, especially for a new player. We never know for sure what an opponent will do, but giving them the correct amount of rope to hang themselves is part of pokers skill.</p>
<p>In <strong>No Limit Hold’em </strong>calculating <strong>implied odds</strong> is harder because after the flop opponents usually do not invest a great deal with a bad hand. They have a clear idea whether their hand is any good and because the bet sizes increase quickly after the flop it crystallises their decision making. Like many other things in No Limit, classifying your opponent and understanding their potential range is a big part of deciding on implied pot odds.</p>
<p>Implied odds are about calculating what you may earn in bets in the future if you continue in the hand and improve. It may not be worth gambling for improvement if hitting that card results in zero pay-off. There are many considerations you must make. What hands could your opponent have? What could he think you are betting with? What is your table image? What is his stack size? Opponent dependant, the same spot against two different players could yield very different implied odds. </p>
<p>Let us assume that in a hand you hold Jh-10h and you enter into a pot at blinds of 100/200 with a stack of 10,000. You raise to 600. Another player with the same stack size as you calls from the big blind. The flop is Kh-4h-2s. Your opponent bets into you with an 800 bet into the 1500 pot. The pot is 2300, costing you 800 to call. You have slightly worse than three to one pot odds which is not good for the flush draw. You know, however, that your opponent probably has a King or pocket queens to make this bet. If you believe the opponent will continue to bet if a flush card hit on the turn then your implied odds are good. If you think your opponent will only bet if a heart does not hit your <strong>implied odds </strong>are bad and therefore you should fold here giving your opponent credit for not continuing to bet in the face of a bad board texture.</p>
<p>Implied odds are not the only consideration in a hand. You should note in the example above that the opponent bet into you as the aggressor which indicates either real strength or lack of appreciation for position. Your information about the opponent whether this is the strength or ignorance of his play will help you make your decision on what to do. Players taking one shot to win the pot then giving up on the turn makes implied odds much smaller and chasing drawing hands more difficult due to the aggressive way online poker usually plays out. </p>
<p>Correct use of <strong>implied odds </strong>is deciding what you expect to win if you hit your hand. If you expect to win nothing due to the flop, scare cards or the tight style of your opponent and an obvious flush on the board may lean you to make a fold. You normally have more implied odds against loose players or amateur players. Professional tight players do not expose themselves to such leaks and implied odds are harder to manipulate. Put a simpler way, good players are harder to trap into betting when they are behind in hands. </p>
<p>You should consider implied odds as part of your hand reading and opponent classification. It is closely related to value betting and bet sizing. It is the relationship between extracting as much as possible from every winning hand and minimising losses when the expected reward is too small to make the gamble worth it. </p>
<p>By Malcolm Clarke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.card-room.com/blog/using-implied-odds-correctly/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Pairs and Sets</title>
		<link>http://www.card-room.com/texas-holdem-faq/big-pairs-and-sets</link>
		<comments>http://www.card-room.com/texas-holdem-faq/big-pairs-and-sets#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 06:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Card Room</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Texas Holdem FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flush draw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limped in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no limit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no limit cash game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over pairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[re-raise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[set]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weaker pair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.card-room.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very interesting hand appeared in a no-limit cash game ($0.50/$1.00) where in I participated. At first, I thought things were just on the right track but later on I realized they were not actually and that situation is already hard to handle. I limped in with pocket 3&#8242;s in the middle position. In late [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting hand appeared in a no-limit cash game ($0.50/$1.00) where in I participated.  At first, I thought things were just on the right track but later on I realized they were not actually and that situation is already hard to handle.</p>
<p>I limped in with pocket 3&#8242;s in the middle position. In late position, a player raised to three times that of the BB ($70 stack). Subsequently, the button called $80 stack. Well, thinking that both players are having fairly deep stacks, I called the extra 2 bets for the huge implied odds.</p>
<p>Then, the flop came –  6 Clubs, 4 Hearts, 3 Clubs and so as a result I checked to the raiser who placed a bet out $10, button folded and I re-raised to $25. My opponent went all in which of course I immediately call.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the turn was 7 Diamonds and river was 5 Clubs. Finally, he flipped over Ks and we divided the pot with the straight on the board.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m wondering. Is that the way you actually play over pairs without fear of the set? And about my opponent&#8217;s options – fold, call, re-raise, or all in, how will you rank them and why will you rank them that way?</p>
<p>Well, personally I ranked his options as fold – call – all in – re-raise.</p>
<p>Thank you in advance.</p>
<p>Carl Vince</p>
<p><em><strong>Carl,</strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong>In the scenario above, I would rank his options as re-raise, all in, call, fold.  A player will only flop a set 11% of the time.  Most players are not going to instantly give you credit for a set.  The more likely option would be that you have a pair such as 10’s or jack, or a flush draw.  I almost bet that he put you on a flush draw or a weaker pair.  He wanted to try and make you pay to draw out on him.  He didn’t realize that he was the one that needed to draw out.</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.card-room.com/texas-holdem-faq/big-pairs-and-sets/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

